tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6641738716446631837.post4922250071292050282..comments2023-08-27T12:35:12.308+02:00Comments on sanscrite cogitare, sanscrite loqui: Where could "real" reviews be published?elisa freschihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17068583874519657894noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6641738716446631837.post-30489143753489749402012-05-21T08:52:49.089+02:002012-05-21T08:52:49.089+02:00Dear Anonymous reader,
I read the second review (...Dear Anonymous reader,<br /><br />I read the second review (because I don't think I can judge about the first one) and I agree with the fact that it is harsh but (most probably) fair, exactly the kind of review I would be happy to read. Praise to the IIAS newsletter, then!elisa freschihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17068583874519657894noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6641738716446631837.post-81402043704442042932012-05-20T19:44:16.307+02:002012-05-20T19:44:16.307+02:00Re: "…the need of "real" reviews, r...Re: "…the need of "real" reviews, reviews which could influence in a positive way the studies in a certain discipline, because they would point out the actual flaws of a book or a project."<br /><br /><b>Yep.</b><br />e.g.,<br /> • http://www.iias.nl/the-newsletter/article/indigenous-history-antidote-zomia-theory<br /> • http://www.iias.asia/article/cambodias-religions-ashes-and-ink<br /><br />There are not many positive answers to your question (of where to publish <b>real</b> reviews) but, at the moment, the I.I.A.S. is one.<br /><br />You should look at putting together your own publication along the same lines of the I.I.A.S. or other "informal" publications (e.g. <i>Anthropology Today</i>) that do have the editorial credibility to publish demolitions (and not just uncritical praise).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com