tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6641738716446631837.post5793124249215957935..comments2023-08-27T12:35:12.308+02:00Comments on sanscrite cogitare, sanscrite loqui: Again against implicit methodologieselisa freschihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17068583874519657894noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6641738716446631837.post-82567972367591436192012-06-26T11:12:14.392+02:002012-06-26T11:12:14.392+02:00Then it's fine!
Best,
AleixThen it's fine!<br />Best,<br />AleixRuy D'Aleixohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16067887151075786024noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6641738716446631837.post-1231306843918692932012-06-25T11:48:14.807+02:002012-06-25T11:48:14.807+02:00Hi Aleix,
do you mean that there is the risk of a...Hi Aleix,<br /><br />do you mean that there is the risk of an infinite regress? <br />Please beware that I am NOT interested in psychological motivations. I do not want to know why one prefers a gender-aware approach. It is enough for me to know that this is the chosen approach, so that I know beforehand that the data will be read from this point of view.elisa freschihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17068583874519657894noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6641738716446631837.post-59487448324296186742012-06-24T16:00:05.956+02:002012-06-24T16:00:05.956+02:00Hi Elisa!
Let me disagree with the major point:
Th...Hi Elisa!<br />Let me disagree with the major point:<br />The real methodology is always implicit - it is the methodology according to which one explains his own methodology, etc. etc. etc.Ruy D'Aleixohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16067887151075786024noreply@blogger.com