Why do Viśiṣṭādvaita Vedāntin authors care for a Mīmāṃsā-related text
which Mīmāṃsākas ignore, and which only seems to deal with minor ritual
topics? Read the rest at my new blog, here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blogs I read
-
-
-
-
-
-
Writings of 20241 week ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Online issues of Indological journals1 year ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
Prize and consolation4 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
More jobs: Job opening at HKU8 years ago
-
What *is* Virtue Ethics?9 years ago
-
Philosopher’s Carnival #1759 years ago
-
[PHI 3000] The God hypothesis9 years ago
-
-
Silk Road phrasebooks10 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
Most popular posts
-
Is there a lasting subject or are there just bundles of emotions/thoughts/feelings which we erroneously call "subject"? If the lat...
-
The book is called Duty, language and exegesis in Prābhākara Mīmāṃsā: Including an edition and translation of Rāmānujācārya's Tantra...
-
I virtually met Aleix many years ago, through his first blog (Fulla de Palma) and we soon became pen-friends until we met in person durin...
-
Indian thought knows basically two ways to justify the validity of the Sacred Texts: the Nyāya and the Mīmāṃsā one. In synthesis, Mīmāṃsā au...
-
Is one allowed to add a word if the sentence just lacks sense, although no manuscript supports the proposed reading? My provisional answer,...
Quest' opera è distribuita con licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 2.5 Italia.
No comments:
Post a Comment