Why do Viśiṣṭādvaita Vedāntin authors care for a Mīmāṃsā-related text
which Mīmāṃsākas ignore, and which only seems to deal with minor ritual
topics? Read the rest at my new blog, here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blogs I read
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sanskrit 20032 weeks ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Some useful link for Orientalists6 years ago
-
More jobs: Job opening at HKU6 years ago
-
-
What *is* Virtue Ethics?8 years ago
-
Philosopher’s Carnival #1758 years ago
-
-
-
-
Early Dzogchen IV: the role of Atiyoga11 years ago
-
-
-
Most popular posts
-
If you have ever tried to ask a philosopher, why he never even tried to start reading about Indian philosophy, you surely know his/her answ...
-
After the two posts (see here and here ) I dedicated to reviews, it came to my mind that I had recently read some quite frank reviews of bo...
-
Independent of its original meaning, the syādvāda theory and several other tenets of Jainism challenge today's attitude to Identity and...
-
What are the requisites of a translation in/from Sanskrit of a philosophical text? 1. Knowing the text and its context. This is the pa... -
Possibly because God is rarely seen as directly interfering in worldly matters (He rather uses karman to do it), I am not aware of philosop...
Quest' opera è distribuita con licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 2.5 Italia.
No comments:
Post a Comment