Why do Viśiṣṭādvaita Vedāntin authors care for a Mīmāṃsā-related text
which Mīmāṃsākas ignore, and which only seems to deal with minor ritual
topics? Read the rest at my new blog, here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blogs I read
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sam exits, stage left.5 days ago
-
-
-
-
Guest Post: Nothing if not family?2 weeks ago
-
Myth vs History3 weeks ago
-
-
-
-
Sanskrit 20034 months ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Some useful link for Orientalists6 years ago
-
More jobs: Job opening at HKU6 years ago
-
-
What *is* Virtue Ethics?8 years ago
-
Philosopher’s Carnival #1758 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Most popular posts
-
Descriptive articles describe data without attempting an interpretation. They may say that a certain sculpture represents a naked woman hold... -
"Obviously , Hindī speakers can distinguish the present from the past, although they have a single word to express both 'tomorrow&...
-
किं वेदाः सकर्तृकाः उत न ? न, कर्त्रस्मरणात् शेषस्तु, कृपया, इह पठितव्यः ।
-
Can one trust dictionaries? Of course not, and not only because they are incomplete or inaccurate, but also because they pretend to represe...
-
Although a good part of my time is spent into reading and translating Sanskrit texts, I still never faced the issue independently of a given...
Quest' opera è distribuita con licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 2.5 Italia.
No comments:
Post a Comment